Comparison
Fathom is the most deliberately simple tool in this category. One screen, no configuration, no cookie banner, EU isolation available, and a company that has been profitable and independent for years. It also has no free plan and no connection to your billing provider, so it will never tell you which channel produced revenue. Pick Fathom if you want privacy-first traffic analytics that takes zero thought. Pick Ripples if you want the same simplicity applied to the question of whether your acquisition spend pays back.
Side by side
Prices are the published list prices as of August 2026. The last group is the one where Fathom may well beat us, and it is in the same table as the rest on purpose.
| Ripples | Fathom | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Entry price | Free until $1K MRR, then $9/mo | $15/mo |
| What the price meters | 100,000 visits and actions a month | 100,000 pageviews a month |
| Free tier | Yes, until $1K MRR | No, 7-day trial |
| Sites included | 1 project, or 10 on the $19 plan | Unlimited sites on every plan |
| Revenue tracking | Stripe, Paddle, Polar, Lemon Squeezy | No billing connection |
| Google Ads spend | Included on every plan | Not available |
| Money and payback | ||
| Revenue from Stripe, Paddle, Polar or Lemon Squeezy | Yes | No |
| Revenue credited to the channel that brought the customer | Yes | No |
| Payback period, per channel | Yes | No |
| Google Ads spend imported | Yes | No |
| ROAS against real paid revenue | Yes | No |
| Retention | ||
| Retention curves | Yes | No |
| Retention split by acquisition channel | Yes | No |
| Traffic | ||
| Real-time traffic, referrers and campaigns | Yes | Yes |
| AI assistant referrals as their own channel | Yes | Shows as a referrer |
| Telegram Mini Apps and native apps | Yes | Script and events API |
| What Ripples deliberately does not do | ||
| Session replay | No | No |
| Heatmaps | No | No |
| Feature flags and A/B tests | No | No |
| Open source | No | No |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
Prices and features change. If you find a row here that is out of date, tell us and we will fix it: a comparison page nobody can trust is worth less to us than no page at all.
The real difference
Fathom is unusually clear about what it is. One page, a handful of numbers, no funnels, no cohorts, no wizard, nothing to configure. For a lot of sites that is exactly right, and the discipline it took to keep the product that small is genuinely admirable.
The thing that simplicity buys is also the thing it costs. A dashboard with no notion of a customer cannot tell you that the 71 visitors from a newsletter turned into 9 paying accounts worth $261 a month, of whom 7 are still paying in month three. That is not a missing feature in Fathom, it is a different product.
Ripples keeps the same low-configuration promise, one script tag and no event taxonomy to design, and points it at revenue instead of pageviews.
“Do you have a lower or free option? Nope.”
Being straight with you
We would rather you found out here than after installing.
Fathom includes unlimited sites on every plan. Ripples charges by project, 1 or 10, so if you have 40 small sites Fathom is straightforwardly cheaper.
Fathom is one screen. There is nothing to learn, nothing to set up, and nothing to get wrong. That is worth real money to some people.
Fathom has an EU isolation option and a serious, long-standing privacy position. We do not compete on that ground.
Everything Ripples adds over Fathom depends on money arriving. If nothing is being paid for yet, you are paying for machinery you cannot use.
There is a longer list of things Ripples deliberately does not do on what we don't do.
Questions
Sources
Checked August 2026. Fathom Analytics is a trademark of its owner and is not affiliated with Ripples. We take no affiliate commission from anyone on this page.
One script tag. Free until $1K MRR. No credit card.