Free tool
What a customer is worth against what they cost to acquire. The ratio is easy arithmetic and the reading is the hard part, so this tells you what your number means, including the case nobody mentions: a ratio that is too high usually means you are not spending enough.
Reading it
You lose money on every customer you buy. Nothing about scale fixes this: more spend means more loss. Acquisition has to get cheaper or retention has to improve.
The business works but there is no margin for error. A price rise, a churn improvement, or a cheaper channel all move you out of this band, and any of them is a better use of a week than a new feature.
The healthy band, and where most sustainable software sits. Worth checking that it holds per channel and not just on the blended average.
Usually a sign of underspending rather than a triumph. You have bought only the cheapest customers. Spending more will lower the ratio and grow the business faster, and that is normally the right trade.
All four of those readings assume the ratio is real. Blended across every channel it usually is not: one channel at 12:1 and one at 0.4:1 average to something that looks like 3:1 and tells you to keep doing both.
Questions
A blended LTV:CAC hides the two channels that matter: the one at 12:1 you should be spending more on, and the one at 0.4:1 you should stop. That is what Ripples does. One script tag, your billing provider and your Google Ads account, and these numbers are computed from real data instead of typed in from memory.
See how that worksOther free tools
One script tag and a billing connection. Free until $1K MRR.